Square Roots is a subsidiary of developer London Square, which won a bid in May last year to be the council’s “delivery partner” for the creation of a new “local centre” in Lea Bridge .
At a full council meeting on 9th December, Conservative councillor John Moss asked if the “close” relationships between the former leader, London Square and the council could create “impropriety”.
He also asked whether there will be an independent audit to make sure taxpayers and residents aren’t “disadvantaged by the presence of a former leader of our council in the management team” of Square Roots.
Councillor Williams said the council’s monitoring office Mark Hynes has advised that there is “no question of any impropriety or conflict of interest”.
She added: “Given Cllr Coghill has now stepped down as both leader and from cabinet it is unlikely that any conflict of interest will arise in her continued role as a councillor.
“However, should such a conflict arise, the monitoring officer’s advice would be sought in terms of the necessary declarations that would need to be made by Cllr Coghill so that she is not put in a position where her integrity is able to be challenged.
“London Square Ltd have confirmed that Cllr Coghill will not be involved in any work in Waltham Forest, including the Lea Bridge Station redevelopment scheme, whilst she remains a local councillor in the borough.”
Cllr Williams added that councillors have the right to persue “gainful employment” while in office, as many other councillors do, and that Cllr Coghill intends to stand down from the council at the local elections in May 2022.
The council leader also wrote that London Square was chosen as development partner after a “robust open market tender process” that was decided by a panel of council officers.
In July this year, a month after Cllr Coghill’s resignation was announced, the council’s legal director upheld a code of conduct complaint against her for failure to declare a conflict of interest.
The council have since clarified that the complaint was related to “outdated information” on the sale of her former home and her change in partner, and that no further action will be taken.
No news is bad news
Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.
The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.
If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.
Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.
Monthly direct debit
Annual direct debit
£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.
Our newspaper and website are made possible by the support of readers and by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider helping us to continue to bring you news by disabling your ad blocker or supporting us with a small regular payment.
No news is bad news 
Add Comment