Council rejects call for review on speed humps

A Conservative motion asking the council to review the impact of noise and vibrations caused by big vehicles going over speed humps was slapped down by Labour members last week, reports Josh Mellor, Local Democracy Reporter

Deputy leader Clyde Loakes angrily responding to the Conservative motion at the full council meeting on 19th October, Credit: Waltham Forest Council

Calls for Waltham Forest Council to review the impact of speed humps on residential properties were dismissed by Labour at a council meeting last week.

The meeting saw two residents from the north of the borough, which has seen a number of new speed humps and tables installed in recent years, directly addressing councillors with complaints about noise and vibrations as vehicles pass over recently installed traffic measures.

After residents spoke, Labour rejected a Conservative motion calling for an “independent review” of what effect speed hump related vibrations have on nearby buildings.

While several Conservatives urged the council to “test” the bumps in response to complaints, only one Labour member, deputy leader Clyde Loakes, spoke before his group dismissed the motion.

Cllr Loakes said speed humps and tables are the “only option” the council has to slow down vehicles and make neighbourhoods “safe for all”.

He added that a “clear and strict” design code governs the traffic measures but failed to address the question of what impact vibrations might be having on residents’ homes.

Emma Best said: “We’re not saying take the humps out, just test them, then we can have it in black and white and you can have it.

“Ask yourself why hundreds of residents are getting together and why people have come here tonight.”

This story is published by Waltham Forest Echo, Waltham Forest's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.

During the meeting, it emerged that at least three Chingford residents who had asked to address councillors about the impact on their lives were not allowed to speak.

Instead, council staff organising the meeting gave two of the four available public speaking slots to residents who spoke strongly in favour of “traffic calming” measures.

Chingford resident Shanta Prasad, who has played a key role in raising concerns about the impact of the traffic measures, said the council had used “unscrupulous methods” during the public consultation to push them onto residents.

She added that the evidence underpinning the council’s support for humps as an effective way of slowing down traffic was decades out of date and not relevant to East London.

Yvonne Johnson, resident of Waltham Way, where several speed humps have recently been installed, said they fail to slow heavy goods vehicles down while causing “earthquake-like” vibrations in her home from as early as 4.30am.

The debate over the Conservative motion became heated at moments, with Cllr Best interrupting Cllr Loakes mid-speech to complain that he was not directly addressing the issue.

Cllr Loakes in turn shouted “come on” at Mayor Roy Berg, who chairs full council meetings, in the belief that he had been denied extra time to speak due to Cllr Best’s interruption.

The final Conservative speaker, Cllr Jemma Hemsted, said it was “astonishing” that no Labour members had volunteered to speak during the debate, despite voting to dismiss the motion.

Cllr Hemsted also singled out her fellow Valley ward councillor Elizabeth Baptiste, suggesting she “couldn’t even be bothered” to reply to residents’ concerns.

You can watch the full meeting here

No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

In celebration of Indie News Week, Public Interest News Foundation's Indie News Fund will match fund all donations, including new annual supporter subscriptions for the month of June.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month.  £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or annually 

More Information about donations