News

Carbon dioxide from new incinerator could be stored undersea

Millions are being spent to investigate whether a “carbon capture” plant could be possible
By Local Democracy Reporter Josh Mellor

The proposed Edmonton EcoPark, including the new incinerator (credit: NLWA)
The proposed Edmonton EcoPark, including the new incinerator (credit: NLWA)

The controversial new Edmonton incinerator could become “one of the first” in the country to include a “carbon capture” plant to make its fumes cleaner.

The North London Waste Authority (NLWA) is currently rebuilding and expanding the incinerator over the border from Chingford, increasing its maximum capacity to 700,000 tonnes of waste a year.

Last month, an NLWA committee led by the authority’s chair Clyde Loakes approved an initial budget of up to £2.5million to investigate whether it would be possible to include a carbon capture plant in the new facility.

Such a plant would capture most of the carbon dioxide the incinerator is expected to produce each year, which would then have to be transported and stored under the sea.

At the meeting where the £2.5m was approved, with the possibility of £7.5m more at a later date, NLWA members raised concerns about the process of transporting the captured CO2 out of North London.

Minutes published this week show programme director David Cullen arguing there are “solutions that merit investigation” and NLWA chair Clyde Loakes strongly supporting the plan.

However, he admitted the authority would need to “push boundaries” and that a solution might take “a couple of years” to be clear.

An early assessment shows there is no simple solution for transporting the CO2 either to the Kent or Norfolk coast.

Using lorries would need “around 100” trips a day, south-eastern England’s railways are already congested and laying a pipeline from Edmonton to the coast “will be challenging”.

Brian Mark, an engineer who has advised the government waste incinerators, said carbon capture is “wishful thinking” to avoid the real problem of relying on fossil fuels.

He said: “It’s all been done in proof-of-concept installations but the costs just make it ‘la la land’ – we’re talking about storing [carbon dioxide] for geological amounts of time.


This story is published by Waltham Forest Echo, Waltham Forest's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.


“It’s never really ever been achieved commercially, there have been attempts obviously and you can do it in the lab, but it’s a matter of getting the scales to the point that it’s commercially possible. 

“They’ll talk about it because it’s the lifeline for the fossil fuel industry.”

However, Stuart Haszeldine, professor of carbon capture and storage at the University of Edinburgh, said he is “very much in favour” of carbon capture schemes at sites where waste is being burned for fuel.

He argued that “joining up” carbon capture with power-generating waste incinerators would make their environmental impact “negative”.

On the undersea storage of carbon dioxide, he added: “There’s evidence that you can monitor it safely and guarantee that it can stay there for the future. 

“Since 1996 a project in Norway has been putting carbon dioxide down a borehole, one million tonnes a year every year for the past 22 years.

“It’s a good thing for the UK to get involved with[…] what we’ve got to guard against is building a plant just to burn waste.”

A spokesperson for the North London Waste Authority said energy-from-waste facilities that “hygienically dispose of waste” should not be conflated with other industries such as factories and fossil fuel-fired power plants.

They added: “However, the development of carbon capture infrastructure is a core part of the government’s plan to take the UK to net zero and it is supporting the development of carbon capture and storage clusters in strategic areas of the UK.

“These clusters will bring greater economies of scale and allow numerous organisations and businesses to tap into a common infrastructure to capture, transport, and lock away carbon emissions.

“Carbon capture and storage would give our new Energy Recovery Facility an even more positive role in protecting our environment, making the facility carbon negative.

“That is why we are investigating its viability with sufficient investment.”

The NLWA is a waste disposal authority run by councillors from the North London boroughs of Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Hackney, Haringey, Islington and Waltham Forest.


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

In celebration of Indie News Week, Public Interest News Foundation's Indie News Fund will match fund all donations, including new annual supporter subscriptions for the month of June.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month.  £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or annually 

More Information about donations

Tags