Leytonstone News

Experts warn Whipps plans ‘grossly underestimate’ demand

Experts are raising many of the same concerns as local campaigners
By Local Democracy Reporter Josh Mellor

Two potential expansion zones have been identified (Barts)
Two potential expansion zones have been identified (Barts)

An expert has warned that Whipps Cross bosses may have “grossly underestimate[d]” future demand when designing the new hospital.

Current designs promise flexible wards with between 515 and 600 beds, supported by a “transformed” community health system to reduce demand on the hospital.

In January this year, Dr Rodney Jones, an expert in hospital demand and capacity, told a multi-council committee that, while the calculations underpinning this design were “impeccable,” there is “always a massive underestimation” when it comes to real-world need.

Dr Jones’s comments support concerns voiced by campaigners and councillors about the future hospital’s bed numbers not being in line with a predicted 10% local population growth.

His expert suggestion is that the hospital compile a set of charts tracking trends such as bed occupation, overnight stays and length of stay over the last ten years.

However, the hospital’s redevelopment team insist their modelling of demand was independently reviewed by healthcare management consultants Carnall Farrar.

They added: “Our assumptions for all aspects of the redevelopment – including activity and capacity assumptions – continue to be subject to review and assurance as part of the national business case process.” 

Professor of natural science analytics Robert van der Meer previously argued that, as plans progress, there will be less and less opportunity to expand the hospital if needed.

He warned: “As the hospital design is further developed and detailed, it is likely that the range of flexibility (e.g. in relation to the range of bed numbers that could be provided) will be irreversibly reduced.”


This story is published by Waltham Forest Echo, Waltham Forest's free monthly newspaper and free news website. We are a not-for-profit publication, published by a small social enterprise. We have no rich backers and rely on the support of our readers. Donate or become a supporter.


In response, the hospital redevelopment team maintain that future capacity will not need to go above current needs, between 570 and 580 beds.

They say this is because NHS services in East London will soon “integrate”, with a £32million budget increase to “transform health and care services” in the community.

With improvements to community care, the NHS predicts a 19-20% reduction in urgent hospital admissions and up to 22% fewer planned attendances. The ‘do nothing’ option would see a need for an average of 643 beds by 2028/29.

In their written response to Dr van der Meer’s concerns, the hospital redevelopment team said: “We continue to work with our architect-led design team to make sure we have flexibility in our planning and our design.

“If necessary, with a few alterations, we could physically accommodate 600 beds – against a current bed base of 570-580.”

Draft designs shown to the Local Democracy Reporting Service have added more “flexibility” by making a floor reserved for administrative staff adaptable into a 28-bed ward.

Barts Health, the trust that runs Whipps Cross, have been approached for comment on where the administration office would be temporarily relocated to, but have not responded at the time of publication.

Despite health bosses’ confidence that transforming East London community healthcare will reduce pressure on hospitals, they also recognised that earmarking space for further expansion on the site is “critically important”.

The redevelopment team wrote: “As the strategy for the new hospital has developed, we concluded that it was critically important to retain some space on the site, adjacent to or close to the new hospital, to allow for expansion of the hospital in the future should that prove necessary”.

As the majority of the Whipps Cross hospital site is due to be developed into residential space, the only possible expansion spaces identified are a second multi-storey car park and the service yard behind the hospital.


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

In celebration of Indie News Week, Public Interest News Foundation's Indie News Fund will match fund all donations, including new annual supporter subscriptions for the month of June.

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month.  £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or annually 

More Information about donations