News Walthamstow

Rogue Walthamstow landlords caught in ‘ghost tenant’ scam fined

A rogue landlord couple who rented their properties to ‘ghost tenants’ to avoid paying thousands in council fees have been fined almost £190,000, reports […]By Waltham Forest Echo

Mohamed Lahrie leaving court after receiving his sentence (LDRS)
Mohamed Lahrie leaving court after receiving his sentence (LDRS)

A rogue landlord couple who rented their properties to ‘ghost tenants’ to avoid paying thousands in council fees have been fined almost £190,000, reports Local Democracy Reporter Josh Mellor

Mohamed Lahrie, 55, and wife Shehara, 51, claimed they were renting six of their properties to a single tenant, which was in fact their letting agent.

This meant Waltham Forest Council did not know they were Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) so did not inspect the homes or charge HMO licence fees.

Their defence lawyer, appealing for leniency at their sentencing, told Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court the properties were just “one percent” of their property portfolio, which they have now been forced to sell.

On 29th September, following a trial in April, District Judge Andrew Sweet fined Mr Lahrie £126,500 and Mrs Lahrie, who did not attend court, £60,500.

He said: “With all these cases there is an erosion in public confidence and that has a detrimental effect on society.

“It seems Mr and Mrs Lahrie have now accepted full responsibility, but all of this litigation would have been avoided some time ago had they taken the decision then that they have now.”

He added he had to choose a “fair and proportionate” financial penalty that would deter other offenders.

The couple, who live in Hoe Street, owned 600 properties in east London through a network of at least 28 companies.

The court heard one of the six relevant properties, in Eastfield Road, was home to seven people under four tenancies, which they claimed was one household.

However, Mohamed Lahrie’s lawyer, Imran Khan QC, insisted the financial benefit of not declaring these six HMOs was “miniscule”

He said: “Mr Mohamed arrived in this country with little money in his pocket and built up a portfolio over two or three decades, through hard work with his wife.

“That property portfolio has been engaged in providing safe and fit homes for many of the residents of Waltham Forest and these six represent one percent of that portfolio. The financial benefit to him was miniscule.

“Mr Mohamed, as a result of this case, has sold his portfolio of properties, he has sold them all.”

Waltham Forest’s legal case began in 2017 but was delayed for four years due to an unsuccessful legal challenge by the Lahries.

Council lawyer Dean Underwood said: “The aim of the licensing regime is to protect the health and safety of those who occupy the most at-risk private premises, that is HMOs.”

He added that the couple had profited “significantly more than market rent” by renting to separate tenants, although the exact figure was not stated in open court.

For example, for a Leytonstone property, in Napier Road, they received more than £33,000 in rent a year without having to pay the £1,000 licence fee or management costs.

Lahrie appeared in court, sitting in a black suit with his arms folded. Outside he told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: “I have learned my lesson and I regret what I did”.

The addresses were in Eastfield Road, Chelmsford Road and Thorpe Road in Walthamstow; Napier Road and Leasowes Road in Leyton; and Ashley Road, Chingford.

At the start of the hearing, letting agent Station Estates Limited was formally cleared of charges against them after the council offered no evidence. According to Companies House, the agency entered bankruptcy in May 2019.

Although there were concerns about overcrowding in some of the properties, there were no safety or quality issues found at the buildings.


No news is bad news 

Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts. 

The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less. 

If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation. 

Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.

Monthly direct debit 

Annual direct debit

£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month.  £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else.

Donate now with Pay Pal

More information on supporting us monthly or annually 

More Information about donations

66 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Our newspaper and website are made possible by the support of readers and by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider helping us to continue to bring you news by disabling your ad blocker or supporting us with a small regular payment.